X Pipeline
The X pipeline monitors configured financial queries and selected source accounts through an approved provider interface. NataPulse does not treat the user’s ordinary X following feed as a free external data API.
Collection model
Section titled “Collection model”Queries can cover:
- core financial voices;
- company and executive accounts;
- ticker catalysts;
- macro and market-regime topics;
- registry-based coverage of reviewed corporate sources.
Collection is constrained by provider access, query rotation, rate limits, and budget policy.
Source registry
Section titled “Source registry”A candidate account is not automatically trusted. Sources move through statuses such as unverified, verified, rejected, or needs review.
A reviewed corporate source can receive a higher reliability treatment. Executive accounts require cautious review because role changes, impersonation, and personal commentary create additional ambiguity.
Processing flow
Section titled “Processing flow”X post → provider response and source identity → raw observation → text and timestamp normalization → entity and cashtag resolution → duplicate and relevance checks → source reliability and rumor gates → importance and confidence → published event when eligible → social cluster and wider cross-source clusterCorroboration rule
Section titled “Corroboration rule”An unverified standalone post should not become a high-confidence event or alert simply because it uses urgent language. Independent news, a filing, market behavior, an official source, or another reliable domain can strengthen the evidence.
What users see
Section titled “What users see”Eligible X events can appear in Live Pulse, Social Radar, Event Explorer, clusters, narratives, reports, Deep Research, and Analyst citations. The original source link remains available when safe.
Limitations
Section titled “Limitations”- deleted, protected, restricted, or unavailable posts may not be retrievable;
- provider access can introduce delay or incomplete historical coverage;
- source verification does not guarantee that every statement from the account is accurate;
- post volume does not equal source independence;
- sentiment and social velocity can be manipulated.
Social evidence is therefore useful for detection and context, but should be read alongside source identity and corroboration.