Skip to content

Deep Research Team

The standard NataPulse Deep Research profile uses eleven logical roles across six phases. It is the execution model used for standard multi-agent research; it is not the execution model for the 51-section U.S. Equity Master.

Frames the ticker research question, horizon, evidence needs, and specialist work plan. It can identify missing context and select relevant analysts.

Examines company, filing, business, financial, and structural evidence that is relevant to the subject.

Examines market structure, price history, volatility, anomalies, and technical context. A chart pattern is not a guaranteed prediction.

Examines news catalysts, regulatory developments, macro conditions, and cross-asset context.

Examines source identity, social attention, sentiment change, rumor risk, and corroboration.

Examines wallet, protocol, transfer, exchange, bridge, and blockchain evidence when relevant.

Builds the strongest evidence-based positive interpretation and identifies its assumptions.

Builds the strongest evidence-based skeptical interpretation, testing source weaknesses, counterevidence, and failure conditions.

Converts competing analyses into a structured research stance, horizon, scenarios, and monitoring plan. “Strategy” describes analytical framing, not trade execution.

Challenges the provisional view and identifies dependencies, data-quality problems, tail risks, invalidation conditions, and confidence limits.

Produces the final source-cited research view, integrating analyst evidence, debate, risk review, confidence, limitations, and what to monitor.

Not every role must run in every standard research case. An on-chain analyst may be irrelevant to a conventional equity investigation, while a fundamental analyst may have little useful evidence for a short-lived market event.

For an eligible U.S. equity Deep run, NataPulse can use the U.S. Equity Master: a 51-section section-writer swarm. It does not expose the standard six-phase team as its execution model or use the standard bull-versus-bear deliverable. After sections are drafted, it completes final synthesis, citation verification, quality review, and artifact rendering. The complete Master is normally opened as its HTML report, with PDF and DOCX downloads when those artifacts are ready.

The run view shows product-safe progress, specialist summaries, evidence, and limitations. A completed artifact may be ready, preparing, or unavailable. These states help distinguish a report that is still being assembled from one whose export could not be made available.